[Plaintext version 1.1, May 20, 1998]
The Book of
CASE REMEDIES
A MANUAL COVERING PRECLEAR
DIFFICULTIES AND THEIR REMEDIES
by
L. RON HUBBARD
PUBLICATIONS ORGANIZATION
UNITED STATES
Published by
The Church of Scientology of California
Publications Organization U.S.
2723 West Temple Street
Los Angeles, California 90026
The Church of Scientology of California
is a non-profit organization
Scientology is an Applied Religious Philosophy
Copyright (c) 1964, 1968, 1975
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Copyright (c) 1964, 1968, 1977
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Revised and Reprinted July 1977
Dianetics (R) and Scientology (R) are registered names
THE E-METER IS NOT INTENDED OR EFFECTIVE FOR THE DIAGNOSIS,
TREATMENT OR PREVENTION OF ANY DISEASE
No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or
by any means electronic or mechanical, including Photocopying,
Recording or by any information storage and retrieval system,
without permission in writing from the Publisher.
Printed in the United States of America.
To The Reader
Scientology is a religious philosophy containing pastoral
counseling procedures intended to assist an individual to
gain greater knowledge of self. The Mission of the Church of
Scientology is a simple one -- to help the individual achieve
greater self-confidence and personal integrity, thereby enabling
him to really trust and respect himself and his fellow man. The
attainment of the benefits and goals of Scientology requires each
individual's positive participation, as only through his own
efforts can he achieve these.
This is part of the religious literature and works of the Founder
of Scientology, L. Ron Hubbard. It is presented to the reader as
part of the record of his personal research into Life, and should
be construed only as a written report of such research and not as
a statement of claims made by the Church or the author.
Scientology and its sub-study, Dianetics, as practiced by the
Church, address only the spiritual side of Man. Although the
Church, as are all churches, is free to engage in spiritual healing,
it does not, as its primary goal is increased knowledge and
personal integrity foe all. For this reason, the Church does
not wish to accept individuals who desire treatment of physical
illness or insanity, but refers these to qualified specialists
in other organizations who deal in these matters.
The Hubbard Electrometer is a religious artifact used in the
Church confessional. It, in itself, does nothing, and is used by
Ministers only, to assist parishioners in locating areas of spiritual
distress or travail.
WE HOPE THE READING OF THIS BOOK IS ONLY THE FIRST STAGE OF A
PERSONAL VOYAGE OF DISCOVERY INTO THE POSITIVE AND EFFECTIVE
RELIGION OF SCIENTOLOGY.
HOW TO USE THIS BOOK
This is a professional text, a part of the Clearing Series. It
does not give the processes on which cases should be run to achieve
higher levels. It gives the processes you have to use when the
case doesn't run on standard processes.
To use this book properly, one does not start or run cases with
the Remedies given. One uses the Table of Remedies, contained
herein, when the case has not run at all or, momentarily or
consistently, does not advance on general processes.
When the case won't run, whether for a session or for many
sessions, look the preclear up in the Table of Remedies and use
the prescribed action only long enough to get the preclear
running again. Then return to the regular processes for the level.
L. RON HUBBARD
PREFACE FOR THIS EDITION
The first edition in 1964 of L. Ron Hubbard's THE BOOK OF
CASE REMEDIES gave auditors necessary points of technology
for the last push to the great Releasing and Clearing successes
that followed.
Only a year later Release Grade and Clearing technology was
completed by L. Ron Hubbard and students were already started
on the big one itself -- the Clearing Course.
In one and a half years from the first Clear, we had close to
seven hundred more Clears.
There is not the slightest question about any part of the route.
People from everywhere and all sorts of backgrounds are taking
their steps easily. The Clearing Course, and the training and
Release Grades leading smoothly to it, are all utterly provenly
successful. Any new list of Clears as of any date has to be
revised upward fast as new graduates finish the Clearing Course,
growing and doubling in numbers.
And to graduate from that course one has attained the state
which is philosophy's win after thousands of years.
There were no Clears before, ever.
THE BOOK OF CASE REMEDIES becomes, with Ron's HCO Bulletins
of 9 November 1967 and 13 January 1968, a new book and a new
technical breakthrough. This expanded edition contains all the
material of 1964. It also releases new technology resulting from
upper level discoveries by L. Ron Hubbard.
His text is thus expanded but is not otherwise changed in this
edition. Remember that except for the new materials added in
this edition, it was written during the last phases of total
Clearing research. Release and Clear were found, in completed
Clearing technology and result, to be higher states than at any
earlier time described.
When Ron says Clear in this book he is talking about what is
now known to be high Release Levels.
O.T., or Operating Thetan, has its levels, all yet above Clear,
and its proper Courses, at the Advanced Organization. Only a
Clear can take them or could handle one.
THE EDITORS
Important Note
In studying Dianetics and Scientology be very, very certain you
never go past a word you do not fully understand.
The only reason a person gives up a study or becomes confused
or unable to learn is that he or she has gone past a word or
phrase that was not understood.
Trying to read past a misunderstood word results in mental
"fogginess" and difficulty in comprehending the passages which
follow. If you find yourself experiencing this, return to the
last portion you understood easily, locate the misunderstood
word and get it defined correctly -- and then go on.
DIANETICS (R): From the Greek dia (through) and noos (soul),
thus "through the soul"; a system for the analysis, control
and development of human thought which also provides techniques
for increased ability, rationality, and freedom from the
discovered single source of aberrations and psychosomatic
ills. Introduced May, 1950, with publication of Dianetics:
The Modern Science of Mental Health by L. Ron Hubbard.
SCIENTOLOGY (R) is an applied religious philosophy and
technology resolving problems of the spirit, life and thought;
discovered, developed and organized by L. Ron Hubbard as a
result of his earlier Dianetic discoveries. Coming from the Latin,
scio (knowing) and the Greek logos (study), Scientology means
"knowing how to know" or "the study of wisdom."
Contents
CHAPTER ONE:
THE TRADITION OF SCIENTOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
CHAPTER TWO:
HANDLING THE PRECLEAR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
CHAPTER THREE:
KEEP THE PC GETTING AUDITED . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
CHAPTER FOUR:
THE PTP, OVERT AND ARC BREAK . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
CHAPTER FIVE:
THE PC THAT QUITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
A1
Revision of Remedy A, Remedy B, and S and D's
CHAPTER SIX:
TABLE OF REMEDIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
CHAPTER SEVEN:
SUPERVISOR'S REMEDIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
CHAPTER EIGHT:
TECHNICAL NOTES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
CHAPTER NINE:
ENVOY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
INDEX TO REMEDIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
CHAPTER 1
THE TRADITION OF SCIENTOLOGY
Once upon a time preclears were full of mysteries and
unknowns. Once, to resolve a case, it was necessary to have a
crystal ball, a clean record with the Archangel Michael and a lot
of luck.
Fourteen active years and tens of thousands of pc's (preclears)
have changed all that.
During this past summer, when I had completed the Routine 6
(pc's own goals) research, I was able to review all the levels and
stages a pc or an auditor (a Scientology practitioner) has to go
through.
What emerged, in getting this material into understandable
form, was that people had, in general, confused Clearing and
Operating Thetans (O.T.'s).
CLEARING
Many had tried to deify Clears and had rarely understood
"O.T."
Clears and clearing are actually fully explained in the first
published article on Dianetics (Dianetics: The Evolution of a
Science), and in Book One (Dianetics: The Modern Science of
Mental Health). Clear is the name of a button on an adding
machine. When you push it, all the hidden answers in the
machine clear and the machine can be used for a proper
computation. So long as the button is not pressed, the machine
adds all old answers to all new efforts to compute, and wrong
answers result.
People who have old, fixed answers reacting when they try to
think, get wrong answers when they try to solve their current
problems. Such old answers are not cleared. Rollo is still
solving the tantrums of his mother who has been dead for years.
Marybelle is still running away from the tramp who attacked her
when she was 10 years old. So Rollo stays home as the solution
to the women of the world. And Marybelle runs madly about as a
solution to all the uncouth men she sees. Their friends think
they're a bit odd. Their doctors
9
prescribe pills. And we clear the old senseless answers which
won't let them get more sensible answers. As adding machines,
or any kind of calculator, they would be junked. They give wrong
answers to life because they already have a hidden answer in
their cog wheels.
They are not cleared.
Well, really that's all a clear is. Clears are beings who have
been cleared of wrong answers or useless answers which keep
them from living or thinking.
THE STATE OF CLEAR
Now the state of being cleared was what confused the issue.
People wanted to know what they'd be like if they were cleared.
A good question. Data accumulated, but not as fast as the
questions. The people, cleared, would be better, feel better,
act better, be more moral, etc. All that is a matter of record.
But the craving for an Absolute caused everyone to put the state
called "O.T." in place of the condition of "being cleared".
"Absolutes," in our axioms, "are unobtainable."
THE STATE OF OPERATING THETAN
Operating Thetan is a state of beingness. It is a being "at cause
over matter, energy, space, time, form and life." Operating comes
from "able to operate without dependency on things" and Thetan
is the Greek letter Theta (theta), which the Greeks used to
represent "thought" or perhaps "spirit", to which an "n" is added
to make a new noun in the modern style used to create words in
engineering. It is also "thetan" or "theta to the nth degree",
meaning unlimited or vast.
THE TRADITIONAL CONCEPT
In brief, a Thetan is an individual spirit or soul or life unit
or fifty other things all adding up to the traditional concept of
man's spiritual nature or beingness. More radical, recent thought
departed into adventurous by-paths and announced, contrary to
more conservative philosophy and usual acceptance, that Man was
an animal made up of a brain and bones and possessing no soul.
This may have made the originators of this quaint Russo-German
school feel less guilty for what
10
they did to men in wars and science. But it takes more than a
Marxist psychologist to change every man's basic philosophy
forever; and 99.99% of Earth's people, at least, still believe they
have souls or are souls. Only the philosophically illiterate and
the agitators for the recent, radical schools of psychology suppose
they have made inroads in man's belief that he has or is a soul.
Only those who seek to enslave Man would try to "sell" the idea
of a "soulless man".
The rest of us, and we comprise, remember, 99.99% of the
population of the planet, still hold to the concept that we are
spirits or spiritual beings and that we go elsewhere when we
"die".
Only men who have quite a thirst for revenge would want
others to totally die.
FOLLOWING TRADITION
Remaining with more traditional philosophy and working with
what seemed more reasonable, I was able to demonstrate in 1952
the actual existence of this thing called a spirit (the experiments
of "Exteriorization"). But wishing to avoid "spiritualism" or even
"soul", because both had such bulky histories as words, I coined
the word thetan, derived as above; and Scientologists ever since
have been quite happy with it.
I should have called it the more traditional Greek word
"psyche", perhaps; but at that time I saw no virtue in being
confused with "psychologists" who explain in their own texts
that they don't know what their own name means, as they don't
know what a "psyche" is and don't believe there is one, which
rather upsets their title to the word they use for themselves.
But anyway, for better or worse, I used "thetan".
THE ULTIMATE STATE
It soon became quite visible that the spiritual condition could
be improved, and an ultimate attainment of "cause over matter,
energy, space, time, form and life" was possible.
Now this was the ultimate state. Operating Thetan: A
theoretically attainable transcendence over death and the
11
travails of mortal existence. It was a dream. A bold dream. But
not a new dream. Like everything else we have in Scientology, it
is based on traditional philosophy. The thinking then of every
great civilization up to this century, not only would have grasped
the meaning of this, but were themselves seeking to attain it.
Name a great name in historical philosophy. All right. He was
trying to attain O.T. by means of exploration of Life, Thought,
Man or the Reason of Things.
Only in the last few decades has the dream been challenged by
a radical few. That they teach in universities is only a comment
that today's universities aren't the halls of enlightenment they
were. Ah well, they can all be improved. And it would take more
than these rebellious few to smash one of Man's great dreams --
the dream of freedom of spirit, the dream of freedom of self, the
dream of ascending above base matter.
CLEAR DIFFERS FROM O.T.
So O.T. was the state of beingness.
Clear was a gradient condition. (A gradual bettering.)
During studies of the past year, all this disentangied and
became understood, and for the first time was easy to express.
Clear is not a gradient up to O.T. Clear is a gradient up to
Homo Novis only. Homo (Man) Novis (new). This is a desirable
improvement. Very desirable for anyone.
An entirely new thing has to be done to make an Operating
Thetan.
But one had to know how to make one to find out about one.
And Routine 6, the process that makes an O.T., starts, really,
at Homo Novis. Certainly Routine 6 runs best on a Homo Novis.
The proof is that those Scientologists who have been pretty well
cleared don't have any trouble at all with Routine 6; and those
who haven't been cleared, and particularly those who have had
few gains in processing, have a pretty awful time of it with
Routine 6. They get a bit along with it, but it's like watching
a pygmy wrestle with an elephant.
Thus, although we have Routine 6, my task has been to
12
bring preclears up to clear and then to send them onward to O.T.
THE LEVELS TO O.T.
This is done -- and very doable it is -- by moving the being up to
a few basic wins with ordinary processing (up to Level III) and
then moving the preclear up to clear (Level IV) and then going
for O.T., which is Level VI (V being skipped, but left in place
because it contains a known type of technology, not needed, but
necessary to know the existence of). To stretch a point, one is
really clearing from Level I to Level IV; but clearing, now that
I've had a chance to refine it, is itself a process that takes skill
and ability both to run and receive. And one has to get the being
up to doing that. So a being who can do that is a "Release",
which reaches up to Level II.
These stages, as expressed in "Levels", are all quite real and are
getting very precise (see Chart of Gradients). Fourteen years of
work developed a lot of know-how. And it all fell into its rightful
place when one got to where one could stand high and inspect
the ground below. One needed Routine 6 and the practical
attainability of O.T to see where one was with the fellow who
just walked in off the street. How did one get such a fellow
from the coal pit to the mountain top? That was the problem.
13
OPERATING THETAN
(Cause over Matter, Energy, Space, Time, Form and Life)
THETA CLEAR
(Not now used, as it is only a partial condition of O.T. Contains
History of Man, Implants, Past Lives, Whole Track Engrams,
Para-Scientology data. Processes not now in active use)
CLEAR
(Does not react with wrong answers to human problems)
HEALTHY
(Susceptibility to illness and accident reduced)
SELF-DETERMINED
(Higher activity level. Less an effect of the environment)
RELEASE
(One who can get better and knows he has benefited and knows
he won't get worse)
APPRENTICE SCIENTOLOGIST
(One who knows how io know. how to study, what life is about)
HOMO SAPIENS
Gradients of Various States
CHAPTER 2
HANDLING THE PRECLEAR
At the lowest place on the route up, one finds the roughest
auditing conditions.
There is no heroic effort that will produce an instantaneous
and permanent gain. One can produce a fast gain that is so fast
it unstabilizes the pc. It's all too sudden and new and the pc
can't take it so quick. Witness the fate of a pc who is suddenly
"exteriorized". "Deprived" of a body even for a few minutes
in auditing, no matter how much better he feels for those few
minutes, the change is too quick, You can exteriorize any pc.
That's sudden and fast and impermanent. So it's a research tool,
not an auditing procedure.
You possibly could clear somebody by some lightning fast
means, but down he'd come again. Why? Because you haven't
cleared enough buttons, that's all. You left too many wrong
answers on the case for the case to be right in a new state.
THE SECRET OF PRECLEAR GAINS
The secret of handling the preclear is getting the pc wins he or
she can have in the world he or she is living in, and getting more
and more such wins, until new gains are acceptable and therefore
stable. After that, you can "go for broke" in Clearing.
And when you have cleared the pc, until he can stand unaided
and get right answers in the existence he or she is living in, you
can again go for broke with Routine 6.
And you eventually have O.T.
BE COMFORTABLE
I speak now from a very well substantiated technical height
which it took all the fourteen years since Book One to climb.
And I find it can be done rather easily, if it is done from step
to upward step and not subjected to an impatient hit or miss
scramble. In scrambling one only gets bruised on the rocks.
15
This is not to say it takes a long time. It takes rather a steady
and orderly time, not flying before one can walk, so to speak, and
being able to look up without getting dizzy and to look down
without being overcome with the grandeur of one's own climb.
Be comfortable about it is the byword.
People enroute at a comfortable rate are actually unaware of
gains! They just take them for granted.
THE AUDITOR'S TASK
The auditor's task in handling the preclear's case is to guide the
pc upward and again upward to comfortable, acceptable wins,
which the pc can have and which, therefore, will be permanent.
16
CHAPTER 3
KEEP THE PC GETTING AUDITED
In order to help anyone, much less make clears and O.T.'s, it is
necessary to keep the pc getting auditing.
That sounds rather easy at first glance with all the dazzling
goals that can be set for him or her. But in actual fact this is the
only place auditors fall down.
Obviously you can't clear anybody, regardless of the techniques
you have, if the preclear won't keep on getting auditing.
Give an auditor a preclear to audit and auditors do very well
indeed.
But when the pc blows, or just doesn't turn up any more, what
then? That's the end of clearing, isn't it?
THE BASIC PROBLEM
So the basic problem of making clears and O.T's is not getting
preclears to have auditing. That's easy, really. It's getting
preclears to KEEP ON getting auditing.
And there is where auditors, yes and Case Supervisors, fall
down.
THE PRECLEAR MUST GET WINS
There are several reasons why it is hard to get a pc to go on
getting auditing.
They add up under the heading, WINS.
If a pc is not getting wins, then two things happen:
(a) Since the pc is not getting more able, the pc is not earning
fast enough or finding the additional time necessary to have
auditing; and
(b) The goal of attaining a higher state is thwarted, and this
ARC breaks the pc.
If a pc is getting wins, then:
(a) The pc gets more able, earns more or finds more
wherewithal, and accomplishes more in a given period of time,
leaving more time to use for auditing; and
(b) The minor upsets or discomforts which accompany even the
smoothest auditing are disregarded.
17
ECONOMICS
I am sorry to have to mention economics, but these play their
role. Operating in a society full of economic traps and snares,
one has to have a solution to them or falter, And this applies to
both the auditor and the pc, regardless of whether there is any
charge for the auditing or not. Freedom from economic, acute
duress means freedom to get audited or audit, and such freedom
is bought more easily by ability than chance. But a person's
progress improves the person's control over things long before
O.T. is approached -- actually long before clear is realized.
THE ROAD IS LONG
People don't realize how long the road is -- they don't want to
confront it. But there's an awful lot of aberration between an
ordinary being and a release, much less a clear. A release is one
who knows he isn't going to get worse.
The command of a release over his time and possessions, while
not overwhelmingly great compared to a clear's, is yet fabulous
compared to one who was never audited at all.
THE NECESSITY FOR WINS
So it is vitally necessary to keep the pc getting wins, no
matter how small, to keep the pc getting audited. This is sometimes
hard to do. For the traps of life are always yawning for the person
near the bottom. In fact the closer the person is to the bottom,
the more likely he or she is to fall into one of life's snares.
Therefore, the closer to the start the person is, the more
necessary it is to get him wins; for the easier it is for him to
be thrown about in his routine daily existence. As catastrophe is
simply arrived at just in day to day living while quite uncleared
and as the person's answers in that state are not likely to have a
high percentage of accuracy, the easier it is for him to get into a
condition where he can't receive further auditing for economic,
social or other reasons. It takes wins to surmount all that.
If a being at any point on the route "blows (departs) for good",
they've lost the final attainment, even if they did have benefits.
18
KNOW THE ANSWERS
So to make releases, clears and O.T.'s one has to know the
answer to:
HOW DO YOU KEEP A PC GETTING AUDITING?
To answer that you have to know the answer to:
HOW DO YOU HANDLE A CASE THAT ISN'T WINNING?
And to know that you have to know:
HOW DO YOU HANDLE CASES?
And to know that you have to know:
HOW DO YOU HANDLE THE PARTICULAR KINDS AND CONDITIONS OF CASES?
All that must seem very vast. And indeed it has been.
The knowledge has been of a highly specialized kind, borne out
of years of training and experience.
What do you do when the pc does what?
Auditing supervisors have been beating their skulls in on such
problems for years.
Therefore, seeing this, I developed a sort of table.
This table or list gives what to watch for, what to look into
when it happens and what to run to take care of it.
Now all these processes are old ones. They're tried and trusty.
I have not tried in this book to give you the magic processes
that assist or release or heal or clear or make O.T., for this
material is not the material the auditor falls down on. In this
book I have given you the processes that keep a pc getting
audited when he seems to stop or wants to stop or might stop.
THE FUNDAMENTAL BASICS
Given any kind of competent training, the auditor must realize
only these things:
(a) If a pc be kept getting auditing, the most dazzling results
can be obtained by following the processes for those results;
(b) If the pc can't be kept at auditing, no results can be
obtained;
19
(c) That the pc who gets regular wins, acceptable to the pc, will
keep on being audited;
(d) That the pc who doesn't get his small quota of wins will
blow; and
(e) That the blowing preclear is the only remaining, generally
unhandled problem in any auditing activity;
(f) That the preclear can be handled so as not to blow and to get
wins.
This book tells you how to do these things.
20
CHAPTER 4
THE PTP, OVERT AND ARC BREAK
The three general areas which prevent wins are: (1) The P.T.P.
(Present Time Problem); (2) The Overt Act (with its withholds of
all varieties); and (3) The ARC Break (a sudden drop in Affinity,
Reality and Communication).
The following facts are some of the best substantiated facts in
the whole of our technology:
THE PRESENT TIME PROBLEM
(1) The presence of a Present Time Problem in a session, unless
handled, will prevent all gain. If a "PTP" exists in the pc and
you try to audit something else and ignore the PTP, the pc's
personality graph will show no change, the TA (Tone Arm of the
Meter) will not move well, the pc will not make his or her
session goals and auditing may eventually cease.
THE OVERT ACT
(2) In the presence of an Overt Act undisclosed to the auditor
and withheld from him, no matter how openly it may once have
been done, the auditing cycle of communication between auditor
and pc (as in TR's 0 to 4) cannot occur, as the pc is withholding.
Therefore, nothing can vanish in the pc's reactive mind and
auditing becomes painful. The graph will not change, nor will
the TA move well.
THE ARC BREAK
(3) In the presence of an ARC Break, the pc's attention is so
distracted by the reactive charge that has been bypassed
(restimulated, but overlooked by both pc and auditor) that the
strain of splitting attention between the charge in the bank and
the auditor will operate to worsen the pc's case, reduce the pc's
graph and freeze the tone arm of the meter. Therefore, one must
not pursue an auditing cycle during an ARC break, but may only
locate and indicate the bypassed charge.
21
THE MAIN POINT
If an auditor doesn't handle these three things competently, the
pc will eventually cease to be audited.
Now recognizing that these three things, the PTP, the Overt and
the ARC break, are all that really forestall continued auditing, it
becomes necessary for the auditor to know his bulletins and be
skilled in practice, and to be successful in releasing, healing,
clearing or making O.T.'s.
I make no attempt here to give all the anatomy and ways of
handling the three demons named above. The technology is all
over the place in bulletins and publications, and also I intend to
do a book on each one.
Here, I only wish to point out that if a pc gets wins, he or she
will get more auditing. If he gets enough steady auditing on
standard processes, he or she will go all the way up. And only
the PTP, Overt and ARC Break can prevent the wins and cause
the blows.
So, to release, heal, clear or make O.T.'s one has to be an expert
on blows, their cause and cure.
22
CHAPTER 5
THE PC THAT QUITS
Pc's who blow or cease to be audited do so because:
(1) Nobody noticed the rising ARC Break;
(2) The proper action was not taken in time.
HANDLING BLOWS
Therefore, one has to do three things in handling a pc who is
about to blow or who blows. (Blow means leave, get out, rush
away, cease to be where one should really be or just cease to be
audited.) These are:
(1) Notice the condition or circumstances leading to a blow
long before the person does. This is probably the single hardest
thing to teach, according to my experience, as it depends on the
auditor, instructor or Scientologist observing and not being so
"reasonable" about the being's condition that nothing is done.
(2) Take the proper action to prevent the blow. By proper
action is meant to find out what the circumstances preceding the
condition have been and then to fit to those circumstances a
course of action. Example: Pc has been running Level I only.
Well, one wouldn't go into Level VI or Level IV processes. If
the pc has been running Itsa (Saying "It's a _______ ."), then
obviously there is only the auditor's acknowledgement to
consider. So one only finds out what hasn't been ack'ed
(acknowledged). Example: If the person has only been studying,
one finds out what the missed definition was. In short, base the
action on what the being who is blowing was doing just before
the blow.
(3) Carry out the course of action effectively. Don't just find
out if the person has withholds. Pull them. Example: HGC pc is
blowing. Pc was running overts. D of P (Director of Processing)
tells auditor to find the missed withhold. Auditor comes back
and says, "Yes, there was one." The D of P thinks, "That's good
-- that's handled." Then the D of P hears that the pc went back to
Smokeville in the middle of the intensive. Checking, the D of P
finds that, although a missed withhold registered on the meter
and one was pulled,
23
there was a filthy needle afterwards. So there were several
missed withholds and an ineffectual job was done.
REMEDIES
Remedies for threats about blowing or blows are only good if:
(1) The condition is observed;
(2) What the person has been doing just before is found out and
a course of action based on that is planned;
(3) The course of action is effectively carried out.
Unless these things are done, one often finds the person who is
blowing is already beyond reach. Remedies not properly selected
or carried out do not seem to work, and so get invalidated.
Remedies are quite workable when the above steps are followed.
But a pie that is too sour and requires sugar, doesn't get any
sweeter if you pour salt into it; whereas salt is perfectly
acceptable when added to a dish that needs salt.
24
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
Remimeo HCO BULLETIN OF 9 NOVEMBER
1967
REVIEW AUDITORS
BOOK OF CASE REMEDIES
REVISION OF REMEDY A, REMEDY B,
AND S AND Ds
(Book revision: Book of Case Remedies; this HCO B modifies
and clarifies the text.)
This bulletin is to be inserted in and changes "The Book of
Case Remedies" PROCEDURES for Remedy A, Remedy B and S and Ds
(Search for and Discovery of Suppressives).
Recent analysis made of Qualifications Divisions Departments
of Review and of the flow of students and pcs through the Saint
Hill org show:
1. The KEY processes so far as orgs are concerned are
Remedy A, Remedy B and S & Ds.
2. Auditors need direct mechanical technology to do these
three processes effectively.
REMEDY A
Remedy A locates the MISUNDERSTOODS a person has in
Scientology. Originally it read "Misunderstood words." Words of
course will emerge in the general run of misunderstoods.
Remedy A is done only by LISTING. It must not be done
verbally alone. It is a Level III process.
The listing question is "In the subjects of Dianetics Or
Scientology who or what has been misunderstood?"
The item is found on the list and given to the student. That is
all. There is no other step.
The rules of listing all apply.
If the student won't have the item it is not correct and the list
must be straightened up with the general auditing rules that
govern listing.
A-1
REMEDY B
The form of this process is changed. It is done by three lists.
These three may only be done by formal LISTING and the
general tech of listing as governed by Level III tech.
The lists make the form of an I
--->----------->--- PT Subject List
|
V
|
Into Past List
|
V
|
--->----------->--- Misunderstood List
LIST 1B
This is done to locate what in the Scientology PT is giving
trouble. It is done as a list and the item is found.
The listing question is:
"In your studies of Dianetics and Scientology who or what are
you having trouble with?"
The item is found and given to the student.
This step is governed by all the tech of listing.
LIST 2B
The item found on List 1B is now listed in order to find the past
track subject similar to what is giving trouble in present time.
The listing question is:
"In your past, who or what was similar to _______ (item found
in List 1B)?"
It is highly illegal to limit the question to this lifetime.
All the rules of listing apply.
The item is found and given to the student.
LIST 3B
The third list of the process is now done.
The listing question is:
"Who or what was misunderstood in _______ (the item found
on list 2B)?"
The listing is covered by the general tech of listing as found in
Level III.
The item is found and given to the student.
A-2
This completes the Remedy B.
If a floating needle occurs at any time during the process with
good indicators thoroughly visible in the student the process is
concluded at that point.
The process is used on anyone having trouble studying
Dianetics or Scientology. The trouble, as it doesn't clear up with
Remedy A, is coming from some prior subject.
More than one of these can be done if all steps are done for each
one.
S & D
Search and Discovery of Suppression is called an "S and D." It
locates the suppressives on the case.
I have several times undercut (gotten processes that reach
deeper) on S & Ds.
The earliest process asked merely who might have been
suppressive to the pc. This is still valid, but I have found two
flaws in it.
1. The auditor does not do a listing type S & D at all but just
chattily brushes it off.
2. The list from this question contains an actual suppressive
that is passed right over.
Therefore I undercut the question and obtained much better
results because the new question reached deeper.
The new question was "Who or what might have suppressed
you."
Then I recalled an even deeper question. This was: "What
purpose has been suppressed?" This was given to Qual Div SH some
time ago. It would have 2 lists. The first is for the purpose
as above and the second would be: "Who or what suppressed
_______ (purpose found)?"
For some reason, probably because no one did 2 lists, this
undercut was neglected.
Therefore I researched further and developed what we will now
use as an S & D.
It is one of these killer processes. It is VERY strong. So it
isn't to be carelessly done.
If you get a wrong item on an S & D YOU CAN MAKE THE PC ILL.
So one has to do an S & D right and follow all the rules of
listing as given in Level III tech.
A-3
Also I find now that when a list item found is a generality
(multiple subject, not specific such as "dogs" or "the public")
the list is simply not complete. One does not have to settle for a
generality and then list the generality. He will find that the
pc will eventually list the specific non-general item anyway. Of
course one can also do a represent list of a general item found if
that seems best.
The real question for an S & D was established only when I
found a purpose all Suppressives have in common and is a very
fundamental effort in suppressives. This effort by suppressives,
when found, then permitted me to form the question.
The key S & D question is:
"Who or what has attempted to unmock you?"
Unmocking (an effort to reduce or make disappear) is the
primary effort of suppressives.
Therefore the listing question on test delivers up items totally
overlooked by the earlier types of S & D.
The question needs to be cleared carefully for non-Scientology.
If it has to be rephrased, watch out as the meaning may vanish.
"Tried to make nothing of you" might substitute but at this
writing only unmock has been tested and a question for others
than educated Scientologists will be developed and issued and
made part of the enclosure for the book.
This S & D question must be done by LISTING only and with
great care to follow Level III listing tech as it, being powerful,
will backfire on the pc if done carelessly and a wrong item is
found.
The item is found by listing and given to the pc, which is the
end of the process. If a generality results it may be represented.
But listing continued will give the same result of a single item. A
general item must not be given to the pc as the final result.
This process will now be standard review S & D.
LRH:jp L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright (c) 1967 Founder
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
A-4
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
Remimeo
HCO BULLETIN OF 13 JANUARY 1968
S & Ds
There are three types of S & D (Search and Discovery). These
are used to nullify the influence of Suppressive persons or things
on a case so the person will be able to be processed and will no
longer be P.T.S. (a Potential Trouble Source). People who are
P.T.S. became that way because of suppression by persons or
objects. Insanity is also remediable by S & Ds where the person
can be Processed.
These are all LISTING processes and if the auditor is not well
trained and good at the technology of listing, not only will no
good result occur but the pc (given a wrong item, overlisted or
underlisted, or audited over an ARC Break or PTP) can be made
ill.
Pcs who become ill are always to a greater or lesser degree
PTS.
These questions should not be shown to a pc as they may start
him self listing.
The "type" is determined by the 1st letter of the key word in the
listing question.
S & D TYPE U
"Who or what has attempted to unmock you?"
Where this does not communicate, "Who or what has tried to
make nothing out of yon?" A very had off case may respond best
to "Who or what has unmocked you"
This (above) is the standard and most used S & D.
S & D TYPE S
"Who or what are you trying to stop?"
This works on all cases to a greater or lesser degree. It is
particularly useful on a case that is giving a great deal of trouble,
gets small reads or is rather suppressive. This should work on
the insane also as the point where a thetan becomes insane is the
point where he begins to generally stop things. I looked for years
for the exact point where a thetan ceased to he sane and become
insane on any given subject and finally found that it was the
exact moment he became dedicated to trying to stop whatever it
was.
S & D TYPE W
"Who or what ar you trying to withdraw from?"
This is the action after a failure to stop has occurred.
In administering these, the best order would be Type W, Type S
and then Type U, if you are going to give them all to the same pc
in a row.
Any or all can he given to the same pc.
S & Ds can he given more than once to the same PC.
Properly listed the results are magical. If they are not magical,
then listing tech is badly out and should be restudied from ALL
materials and taps on the subject.
Errors are located and repaired by the recent new L4A (HCOB
of 9 January 1968).
LRH:jp L. RON HUBBARD
Copyright (c) 1968 Founder
by L. Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
A-5
BOARD TECHNICAL BULLETIN
14 AUGUST 1968 R
REVISED & REISSUED 11 AUGUST 1974
AS BTB
Remimeo
CANCELS
HCO BULLETIN OF 14 AUGUST 1968
SAME TITLE
(The only revision is in the last paragraph:
"this HCO B" is revised to read "this BTB")
REMEDY B -- ENVIRONMENT
AND "NEW STYLE"
The Remedy B Environment and "New Style" are both used for
the purpose of handling difficulties which the preclear is
currently having. These remedies when done properly have rapid
and effective results. They are also used to handle glee, which is
an extreme case of misunderstoods.
The commands for REMEDY B ENVIRONMENT are:
1b Listing Question
1b "In your environment who or what are you having trouble with?"
2b Listing Question
2b "In your past who or what was similar to _______ (1b item)?"
3b Listing Question
3b "Who or what was misunderstood in _______ (2b item)?"
A-6
Remedy B "NEW STYLE" is done in the following way:
1. Select a few related subjects that the Pc may have had
difficulty with. (Can include psychoanalysis, hypnotism,
mathematics, Navigation, etc.)
2. Assess what was sketched out in number 1 and take the one
that reads and do the standard actions of Remedy B above.
1b "NEW STYLE" Question
1b "In _______ who or what are you having trouble with?"
2b and 3b commands are the same as in Remedy B.
The commands and data of this BTB are compiled from LRH
Supervised case folders in the Sea Org.
Compiled by CS-5 Tech and
Qual Aide
Revised & Reissued as BTB
by Flag Mission 1234 I/C:
CPO Andrea Lewis 2nd:
Molly Harlow
Authorized by AVU
for the
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS of
the CHURCHES OF
SCIENTOLOGY
BDCS:SW:AL:MH:mh
Copyright (c) 1968, 1974
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
A-7
HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex
HCO BULLETIN OF 10 AUGUST 1973
Remimeo
A/Guardians
HCO Secs
E/Os
MAAs
Tech Secs
Ds of P
PTS Pack PTS HANDLING
(PTS = Potential Trouble Source)
There are two stable data which anyone has to have, understand
and KNOW ARE TRUE in order to obtain results in handling
the person connected to suppressives.
These data are:
1. That all illness in greater or lesser degree and all foul ups
stem directly and only from a PTS condition.
2. That getting rid of the condition requires three basic actions:
A. Discover,
B. Handle or disconnect.
Persons called upon to handle PTS people can do so very easily,
far more easily than they believe. Their basic stumbling block is
thinking that there are exceptions or that there is other tech or
that the two above data have modifiers or are not sweeping. The
moment a person who is trying to handle PTS's gets persuaded
there are other conditions or reasons or tech, he is at once lost
and will lose the game and not obtain results. And this is very
too bad because it is not difficult and the results are there to
be obtained.
To turn someone who may be PTS over to an auditor just to
have him mechanically audited may not be enough. In the first
place this person may not have a clue what is meant by PTS and
may be missing all manner of technical data on life and may be
so overwhelmed by a suppressive person or group that he is quite
incoherent. Thus just
A-8
mechanically doing a process may miss the whole show as it
misses the person's understanding of why it is being done.
A PTS person is rarely psychotic. But all psychotics are PTS if
only to themselves. A PTS person may be in a state of deficiency
or pathology which prevents a ready recovery, but at the same
time he will not fully recover unless the PTS condition is also
handled. For he became prone to deficiency or pathological
illness because he was PTS. And unless the condition is relieved,
no matter what medication or nutrition he may be given, he
might not recover and certainly will not recover permanently.
This seems to indicate that there are "other illnesses or reasons
for illness besides being PTS". To be sure there are deficiencies
and illnesses just as there are accidents and injuries. But
strangely enough the person himself precipitates them because
being PTS predisposes him to them. In a more garbled way, the
medicos and nutritionists are always talking about "stress"
causing illness. Lacking full tech they yet have an inkling
that this is so because they see it is somehow true. They cannot
handle it. Yet they recognize it, and they state that it is a
senior situation to various illnesses and accidents. Well, we
have the tech of this in more ways than one.
What is this thing called "stress"? It is more than the medico
defines it -- he usually says it comes from operational or physical
shock and in this he has too limited a view.
A person under stress is actually under a suppression on one or
more dynamics.
If that suppression is located and the person handles or
disconnects the condition diminishes. If he also has all the
engrams and ARC Breaks, problems, overts and withholds audited
out triple flow and if ALL such areas of suppression are thus
handled, the person would recover from anything caused by
"stress".
Usually the person has insufficient understanding of life or any
dynamic to grasp his own situation. He is confused.
A-9
He believes all his illnesses are true because they occur in such
heavy books!
At some time he was predisposed to illness or accidents. When
a serious suppression then occurred he suffered a precipitation
or occurrence of the accident or illness, and then with repeated
similar suppressions on the same chain, the illness or tendency to
accidents became prolonged or chronic.
To say then that a person is PTS to his current environment
would be very limited as a diagnosis. If he continues to do or be
something to which the suppressive person or group objected he
may become or continue to be ill or have accidents.
Actually the problem of PTS is not very complicated. Once you
have grasped the two data first given, the rest of it becomes
simply an analysis of how they apply to this particular person.
A PTS person can be markedly helped in three ways:
(a) gaining an understanding of the tech of the condition
(b) discovering to what or to whom he is PTS
(c) handling or disconnecting.
Someone with the wish or duty to find and handle PTS's has an
additional prior step: He must know how to recognize a PTS and
how to handle them when recognized. Thus it is rather a waste of
time to engage in this hunt unless one has been checked out on
all the material on suppressives and PTS's and grasps it without
misunderstoods. In other words the first step of the person is to
get a grasp of the subject and its tech. This is not difficult to
do; it may be a bit more difficult to learn to run an E-meter and
considerably more difficult to learn how to list for items, but
there again this is possible and is much easier than trying to
grope around guessing.
With this step done, a person has no real trouble recognizing
PTS people and can have success in handling them which is very
gratifying and rewarding.
Let us consider the easiest level of approach:
i) Give the person the simpler HCOBs on the subject
A-10
and let him study them so that he knows the elements like "PTS"
and "Suppressive". He may just cognite right there and be much
better. It has happened.
ii) Have him discuss the illness or accident or condition,
without much prodding or probing, that he thinks now may be
the result of suppression. He will usually tell you it is right here
and now or was a short time ago and will be all set to explain it
(without any relief) as stemming from his current environment or
a recent one. If you let it go at that he would simply be a bit
unhappy and not get well as he is discussing usually a late lock
that has a lot of earlier material below it.
iii) Ask when he recalls first having that illness or having such
accidents. He will at once begin to roll this back and realize that
it has happened before. You don't have to be auditing him as he
is all too willing to talk about this in a most informal manner.
He will get back to some early this-lifetime point usually.
iv) Now ask him who it was. He will usually tell you promptly.
And, as you are not really auditing him and he isn't going
backtrack and you are not trying to do more than key him out,
you don't probe any further.
v) You will usually find that he has named a person to whom
he is still connected! So you ask him whether he wants to handle
or disconnect. Now as the sparks will really fly in his life if
he dramatically disconnects and if he can't see how he can, you
persuade him to begin to handle on a gradient scale. This may
consist of imposing some slight discipline on him such as
requiring him to actually answer his mail or write the person a
pleasant good roads good weather note or to realistically look at
how he estranged them. In short what is required in the handling
is a low gradient. All you are trying to do is MOVE THE PTS
PERSON FROM EFFECT OVER TO SLIGHT GENTLE CAUSE.
vi) Check with the person again, if he is handling, and coach
him along, always at a gentle good roads and good weather level
and no H E and R (Human Emotion and
A-11
Reaction) if you please.
That is a simple handling. You can get complexities such as a
person being PTS to an unknown person in his immediate vicinity
that he may have to find before he can handle or disconnect.
You can find people who can't remember more than a few years
back. You can find anything you can find in a case. But simple
handling ends when it looks pretty complex. And that's when you
call in the auditor.
But this simple handling will get you quite a few stars in your
crown. You will be amazed to find that while some of them don't
instantly recover, medication, vitamins, minerals will now work
when before they wouldn't. You may also get some instant
recovers but realize that if they don't you have not failed.
The auditor can do "3 S & Ds" after this with much more effect
as he isn't working with a completely uninformed person.
"3 S & Ds" only fail because of wrong items or because the
auditor did not then put in triple rudiments on the items and
then audit them out as engrams triple flow.
A being is rather complex. He may have a lot of sources of
suppression. And it may take a lot of very light auditing to
get him up to where he can do work on suppressives since these
were, after all, the source of his overwhelm. And what he did
to THEM might be more important than what they did to HIM but
unless you unburden HIM he may not get around to realizing
that.
You can run into a person who can only be handled by
Expanded Dianetics.
But you have made an entrance and you have stirred things up
and gotten him more aware and just that way you will find he is
more at cause.
His illness or proneness to accidents may not be slight. You
may succeed only to the point where he now has a chance, by
nutrition, vitamins, minerals, medication, treatment, and above
all, auditing, of getting well. Unless you jogged this condition,
he had no chance at all: for
A-12
becoming PTS is the first thing that happened to him on the
subject of illness or accidents.
Further, if the person has had a lot of auditing and yet isn't
progressing too well, your simple handling may all of a sudden
cause him to line up his case.
So do not underestimate what you or an auditor can do for a
PTS. And don't sell PTS tech short or neglect it. And don't
continue to transfer or push off or even worse tolerate PTS
conditions in people.
You CAN do something about it.
And so can they.
L. RON HUBBARD
FOUNDER
LRH:nt
Copyright (c) 1973
by L. Ron Hubbard
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
A-13
CHAPTER 6
TABLE OF REMEDIES
REMEDY A
Applies to: ANY COURSE STUDENT, including P.E.
What is Noticed: Noted to be frowning or nattering.
What is Established: Mainly has been studying.
What to Do: Effectively clarify definitions recently studied.
REMEDY B
Applies to: ANY COURSE STUDENT, including P.E.
What is Noticed: Noted to be frowning, nattering or criticising,
and asking questions which really don't apply to Scientology or
twist it.
What is Established: Has been studying similar subjects for
years.
What to Do: Get the person audited on definitions not grasped in
subjects similar to Scientology and studied previously by the pc.
(In P.E. this is assigned as self-audit; in all Other cases it is
audited by an auditor.)
REMEDY C
Applies to: ANY STUDENT.
What is Noticed: Being destructive in any way, criticising
instructors, auditors.
What is Established: Mainly has been studying.
What to Do: Get upper course student or competent, qualified
student to find and pull withholds missed by "Scientologists"
and to find when they missed them.
REMEDY D
Applies to: ANY PC.
What is Noticed: Criticising own auditor in session.
What is Established: Has been getting auditing from this auditor
for only this session.
What to Do: Look for and pull withholds other auditors have
missed.
25
REMEDY E
Applies to: ANY PC.
What is Noticed: Criticising own auditor in session.
What is Established: His been audited smoothly for more than
one session by this auditor or has personal relationships with
auditor.
What to Do: Look for and pull overts pc has committed against
this auditor.
REMEDY F
Applies to: ANY PC.
What is Noticed: Criticising own auditor in session.
What is Established: Has been being audited by auditor who is
now antagonistic to pc.
What to Do: Get an ARC Break Assessment done (Level III to
VI) on appropriate list and also on List One (L1 for Session
ARC Breaks). Then have both pc's and auditor's O/W's pulled on
each other.
REMEDY G
Applies to: ANY PC.
What is Noticed: Criticising course or organization.
What is Established: Has been audited some time without gain
(minimal TA).
What to Do: Get an ARC Break Assessment run on pc, using the
list for processes last run and session list also. Do bypassed
charge assessment, clearing each appropriate list and session
list. Then look for undisclosed PTP's and hidden standards, and
handle by Itsa on solutions they have had for each problem as it
is found, until it does not needle register on "How do you feel
now about _______ ?"
REMEDY H
Applies to: ANY PERSON.
What is Noticed: Refusing auditing.
What is Established: Has never been audited.
What to Do: Discover what goal this person has had that has
been thwarted. Indicate it to person as the bypassed charge. Find
who in the person's surroundings didn't acknowledge and spot
incomplete comm cycles to that person.
26
Find other people in pc's life who didn't ack. Spot these cycles,
etc. Then handle as a routine case, but use only light processes.
Itsa on solutions to problems, then locational, and then
havingness.
REMEDY I
Applies to: ANY PERSON.
What is Noticed: Being bitter about Scientology, being very
argumentative.
What is Established: No experience with Scientology.
What to Do: Avoid discussion of Scientology. Discuss only other
subjects, similar to Scientology, person has not understood, until
person feels better about them. (This is not done as auditing.)
Then find what goal has been thwarted by earlier, similar subject
person is most sour on and indicate it as bypassed charge and
proceed as in REMEDY H.
REMEDY J
Applies to: ANY PERSON.
What is Noticed: Criticising you as a Scientologist.
What is Established: No experience with Scientology.
What to Do: Have person discuss difficulties they have had in
helping people. (Handle these as incomplete comm cycles the
person has.) Be careful to ack any overts disclosed, but don't
probe for any not volunteered. Proceed then as in REMEDY H.
REMEDY K
Applies to: ADVANCED PC (upper levels).
What is Noticed: Refusing auditing.
What is Established: Has had some highly restimulative,
unsuccessful auditing.
What to Do: Do appropriate ARC Break Assessment to fit the
processes run. Thus locate and indicate the main process charge.
Do a session type ARC Break Assessment as needed (if pc is
still not cheerful). When ARC break's gone, audit pc on
bypassed charge assessments on same lists used to locate ARC
break. Go on processing processes that. were already in progress.
27
REMEDY L
Applies to: ANY PC.
What is Noticed: Pc refusing a majority of available auditors.
What is Established: Pc has been ARC broken by some
practitioner somewhere or by auditors.
What to Do: If audited at Level III or below, do generalized
(wording questions on list, "In auditing _______ ?") ARC
Break Assessment with L1 (can be broadened to include any
practitioner, pre-scientology). If audited above Level III, do ARC
Break Assessment using list for process most recently run, then
generalized ARC Break Assessment with L1 (session). Then pull
withholds auditors (or earlier practitioners) have missed. Then
pull overts on past auditors (or practitioners). Then if pc not
cheerful, pull overts on present auditor. Resume process that was
being run.
REMEDY M
Applies to: ANY PC.
What is Noticed: Pc has blown.
What is Established: Audited over ARC breaks.
What to Do: Examine reports carefully and find earlier session
where pc first set a sour, beginning-of-session goal. Examine
the session immediately before that session and list, from the
report on that earlier session, several possible reasons for
bypassed charge for both the process that was used and List One
(Session ARC Breaks). By any communication means, indicate
each of these possible reasons as possible bypassed charge
to the pc. When pc returns, do generalized bypassed charge
assessments covering the types of processes run during and since
the first ARC break. Then do an L1 bypassed charge assessment
in a generalized (any session) form. Then determine what goals
in auditing have been thwarted, handling by Itsa and letting pc
cognite on the various bypassed charges thus located. Then
resume auditing what was interrupted by the blow.
REMEDY N
Applies to: ANY PC.
What is Noticed: Leaving session good but consistently
28
returning to next session caved in with new PTP's.
What is Established: Find out if pc has someone close to him
opposed to and fighting Scientology and making nothing of him
or his gains.
What is Done: If so, have pc move out of that environment for
the duration of any intensive.
REMEDY O
Applies to: INSANE PC.
What is Noticed: Relatives or others demanding something must
be done.
What is Established: Pc can best be helped by providing a safe
environment.
What to Do: Advise isolation and quiet rest away from usual
areas and associations, and forbid physically damaging
treatments of any kind.
REMEDY P
Applies to: ANY PC.
What is Noticed: Pc continually over-restimulated despite
effective auditing.
What is Established: Gets more restimulated by usual
environment than auditing can stay even with. What is Done:
Advise change of residence and no work during period of
intensive.
REMEDY Q
Applies to: ANY PC.
What is Noticed: No remedy seems to work.
What is Established: Discover what other therapies or exercises
pc is also doing between sessions.
What is Done: Run Itsa on ideas he has had to help himself until
original difficulty shows up, and handle it.
29
CHAPTER 7
SUPERVISOR'S REMEDIES
The following section of the Table of Remedies applies to any
session; therefore, the "Applies to" portion is omitted. The "What
is Observed" portion of each remedy refers to what the supervisor
observes in auditing reports or sees in the actual session. The
"What to Do" portion refers to what the supervisor now looks for
or establishes to be the case. The "What to Direct" portion is
what the supervisor tells the auditor to do, either directly, or
by writing it on the auditor's report.
Recognize that these following remedies also should be used by
the individual auditor.
REMEDY R
What is Observed: No TA action, were getting it -- not now
getting it.
What to Do: Look back through past reports to see when the TA
ceased and what happened at that time.
What to Direct: Some earlier process is unflat or auditor didn't
handle something. Tell auditor to flatten earlier process or to
handle what was found.
REMEDY S
What is Observed: TA gone high.
What to Do: Go back and find where TA was low. Find the point
just after that where something happened. Investigate that time
period for what happened. (PTP, missed withhold, etc.)
What to Direct: Handle what is found.
REMEDY T
What is Observed: Pc sour when giving gains (didn't make most
of session goals).
What to Do: Investigate the session through report, auditor or pc.
(Auditor over-flattened a process, Q and A'ed or whatever.)
What to Direct: Handle what happened that soured the pc,
specifying what happened.
30
REMEDY U
What is Observed: Auditor reports that pc's comments are
critical.
What to Do: Investigate that session. (PTP, missed withholds,
ARC break, etc.)
What to Direct: Handle, specifying what was found.
REMEDY V
What is Observed: Auditor says pc is being run on wrong
process. Yet there is TA action.
What to Do: Pc protesting process; auditor agreeing.
What to Direct: Flatten process.
REMEDY W
What is Observed: Auditor says pc has an unflattened process.
What to Do: Maybe the pc is only in a win. Something wrong.
Find out by talking to pc.
What to Direct: If process pc won on is unflat, flatten that after
you've flattened what you're doing. If pc is only stuck in a win,
get pc's considerations on it off and unstick the pc so he can be
run on anything.
REMEDY X
What is Observed: Auditor comments process is flat while still
getting TA action on it.
What to Do: Normally on investigating, you find pc is protesting
process is flat and the auditor has agreed, saying TA action is on
"Protest".
What to Direct: Get session ruds in; flatten process.
REMEDY Y
What is Observed: Auditor suggesting some weird solution (like
pc can't be audited where pc is being audited).
What to Do: Find out why auditor is suggesting solution.
(Maybe withholds from others around, etc.)
What to Direct: Handle the reason the solution is being
suggested. (Itsa, any elementary brief process.)
31
REMEDY Z
What is Observed: Auditor blaming pc's condition on course,
instructors, etc. Or if not on course, is blaming pc's environment
for condition. (Student auditor comments, "The course is
over-restimulative. Don't let pc study or anything.")
What to Do: Recognize that auditor is not good at destimulating
pc, but good only at restimulating.
What to Direct: Run destimulation processes only (PTP's, overts,
etc.).
REMEDY AA
What is Observed: Pc has had electric shock. Auditor's solution
is to run it out.
What to Do: Supervise heavily to prevent it from being done.
What to Direct: Light touch. Don't go near it. Let pc get on top.
Don't throw pc into something he or she can't handle. Locational
processes, ARC straight wire, etc.
REMEDY AB
What is Observed: No TA action on chronic somatics. Auditor
wants to do something instantly, but no TA on it. Auditor has all
kinds of reasons why something must be done about it.
What to Do: Find something out about the whole subject that
reacts well on meter (hospital, doctor, etc.) and that you can get
TA action on, or what they weren't able to do because of it, or
what it got pc out of doing, or what it would cost to lose it.
What to Direct: Run that.
REMEDY AC
What is Observed: Pc gets queasy in auditing (an auditing
queasiness).
What to Do: Havingness down. Auditor is not really running a
havingness process right.
What to Direct: See that havingness is run right or pc's right
havingness process is found.
32
REMEDY AD
What is Observed: While being audited, pc doesn't want to be
controlled. Not ARC broken, just balky.
What to Do: Check Help.
What to Direct: 5-way Help bracket.
REMEDY AE
What is Observed: Pc complaining about mass, no matter what
you run. (Auditor says, "Every time pc talks of 1962 he gets
mass.")
What to Do: Recognize it's a service facsimile.
What to Direct: Locate and handle the pc's service fac.
REMEDY AF
What is Observed: The degraded type pc (never been able to
help). The "can't" type pc (can't audit, etc.).
What to Do: Discover if, in actual fact, they're being effective
in the area they say they aren't.
What to Direct: Appropriate sec. checking. (There are hidden
overts in the area of the complaint.) (A special sec. check list
may have to be drawn up for area.)
REMEDY AG
What is Observed: Weird chronic PTP. (The preclear is always
concerned about "husband running around with other women", yet
this is not happening.) No TA action on it. What to Do: If no
TA action on it, find out what the problem really is.
What to Direct: Look for an area around that subject which does
get TA and run it and destimulate the problem. (If TA on it,
handle like any other PTP).
REMEDY AH
What is Observed: Auditors won't audit pc. Constant natterer in
sessions, nothing cures.
What to Do: Find out if pc's ARC broken with life.
What to Direct: R4H (R2H was the older designation of the same
process.)
33
REMEDY AI
What is Observed: Pc runs same incident always.
What to Do: Find what pc is doing with this Chronic PTP that
has never been brought up or recognized. Incident explains
something for pc. (The pc is using the incident as a solution to
some PTP that must be run.)
What to Direct: Locate and run the actual PTP.
REMEDY AI
What is Observed: The pc who has huge overts and no
responsibility for them.
What to Do: Recognize pc has no real idea they are overts and
the actions are not real to the pc.
What to Direct: Run Justifications.
REMEDY AK
What is Observed: The person who's never done anything bad or
irregular in his whole life.
What to Do: Recognize the condition as impossible and that pc
is withholding heavily.
What to Direct: Find the overts by asking, "Have you ever
murdered anyone?" (Ask a lot of shocking questions.) Pc objects,
but gives real ones the pc has done.
REMEDY AL
What is Observed: The pc who can remember nothing.
What to Do: Recognize pc is below recall processes.
What to Direct. Cease pressing for recalls at once. Run totally
objective processes of a simple kind ("Where is room object
_______ ?" etc.), until pc can remember.
REMEDY AM
What is Observed: Pc who won't do any work in a session.
Auditor has to do it all.
What to Do: Recognize that a session is a solution.
What to Direct: "What is an auditing session a solution to?"
Then Done/Not done processes.
REMEDY AN
What is Observed: Pc doesn't want to talk about case. Comes for
session but isn't interested in case.
34
What to Do: Recognize pc can't comm because hasn't anyone to
talk to and has no self. Terminal scarcity.
What to Direct: "Recall a terminal." Also ARC Straight Wire.
REMEDY AO
What is Observed: Pc doesn't think there's anything wrong with
him.
What to Do: Sit down and find what pc thinks he can improve.
"What area do you think you can make some improvement on?"
What to Direct: Process area.
REMEDY AP
What is Observed: Process fine with good TA action; however,
next day process not flat, but no TA action can be gotten on pc.
Also the pc that always has to have new processes.
What to Direct: Find overts or withholds. If these don't cure this,
use any type of Duplication which was a standard process for
duplication trouble. Run duplication. (Two objects, what things
are alike, op-pro-by-dup, etc.)
REMEDY AQ
What is Observed: The unreal pc. (No leg, but has ballet dancer
ambitions.)
What to Do: Recognize fact that pc is in an unreality and that pc
is not confronting.
What to Direct: Run objective reality ("Look around here and
find something really real.") Also old Universe and Valence
processes work on this.
REMEDY AR
What is Observed: Pc looking, doing better, but never seems to
get any gains. Complains.
What to Do: Recognize fact pc on a succumb. Auditor -- pc goals
are contrary. Hidden standard.
What to Direct: "What would have to happen to you to know
Scientology worked?" Run repetitively, and carefully
35
list PTP's that pc uses as answers for eventual handling. The
goof in doing this is not to list PTP's pc brings up. These must be
handled after the process, above, is flat.
REMEDY AS
What is Observed: Pc who wants to shock the auditor.
What to Do: Recognize fact that pc is trying only to produce
effects.
What to Direct: Effect production process, "What could you
really do?"
REMEDY AT
What is Observed: Pc who only wants to give other people's
misdeeds, rarely his own.
What to Do: Recognize pc doesn't give own misdeeds and pc has
withholds.
What to Direct: Jo'burg. Justifications.
REMEDY AU
What is Observed: Pc who always has "withholds" he gets off
that are critical of the auditor.
What to Do: Recognize as symptom of an overt on auditor, or
that pc never recognizes who auditor is. Confuses auditor with
somebody else.
What to Direct: Run overts on auditor or "Look at me. Who am
I?"
REMEDY AV
What is Observed: Pc inventing processes he must have run on
him.
What to Do: Recognize fact that pc has unflattened processes.
What to Direct: Find and flatten unflattened processes.
REMEDY AW
What is Observed: Pc writing auditor huge notes.
What to Do: Realize pc had not been ack'ed.
What to Direct: "What have I heard?" Any other ack process.
(Also "Recall a terminal.")
36
REMEDY AX
What is Observed: Pc who does everything he's not supposed to
do while being audited.
What to Do: Realize pc feels he doesn't deserve auditing.
Wasting auditing. Wasting help.
What to Direct: "Who deserves auditing?" Any of the old time
Valence or Universe processes. Also "Who should be getting
auditing?"
REMEDY AY
What is Observed: Pc who can only be audited by a specific
auditor.
What to Do: Recognize terminal scarcity.
What to Direct: "Recall a Terminal."
REMEDY AZ
What is Observed: Pc who complains processing has ruined
some ability.
What to Do: Find if the process was left unflat.
What to Direct: Flatten the process that "ruined" him.
REMEDY BA
What is Observed: Pc is doing something else other than what
auditor is doing.
What to Do: Recognize pc is doing odd things with questions.
What to Direct: Hand Space Mimicry, or any duplication
process.
REMEDY BB
What is Observed: Pc with withholds, but never gets them off.
What to Do: Recognize pc audited above comm level.
What to Direct: "Who would it be safe to talk to?" or "What
could you tell me?"
REMEDY BC
What is Observed: Pc obsessively digging up bad things in his
case. (You do something for pc and pc has something else
wrong. Can't keep ahead of the pc's difficulties or symptoms.)
What to Do: Establish if pc being audited on own determinism
37
and handle PTP with person making pc get audited. Also Serv
Fac. Also huge, undisclosed PTP or huge, undisclosed overt.
What to Direct: Handle what is established above.
REMEDY BD
What is Observed: Pc in past wins (glories of yesterday).
What to Do: Recognize pc is stuck in wins.
What to Direct: Validation type processing. "What have you
been?" or "Recall a win."
REMEDY BE
What is Observed: Pc, always and only. auditing away at back
track.
What to Do: See if pc isn't heavily over-restimulated.
What to Direct: Destimulative type, light auditing only.
REMEDY BF
What is Observed: pc always running as having been important
identities in the past.
What to Do: See if pc is bitter about present life or if pc feels
degraded about something.
What to Direct: R4H (old R2H redesignated as R4H).
REMEDY BG
What is Observed: pc who uses psychoanalytic terms, symptoms
and explanations continually, or any pc who uses terms and
symptoms of another practice, religion or activity.
What to Do: Establish what practice or body of knowledge it
was.
What to Direct: "What was (practice) a solution to?", O/W on
practitioner, missed withholds from practitioner, misunderstood
terms, unflattened "process". Get the problem the pc was trying
to solve by going to the analyst (or other practitioner). If
problem is occluded, it will finally emerge by getting pc to recall
solutions. (A whole psychoanalysis can be "lock scanned" out in
a short time.)
38
REMEDY BH
What is Observed: Unable to pull an overt.
What io Do: Get the pc's comm level to auditor raised.
What to Direct: Be sure pc is not in an ARC break (if so, get
appropriate assessment done first and handle ARC break). Direct
"What are you willing to talk to me about?" be run until student
or pc in good comm with auditor. Then pull the overts.
REMEDY BI
What is Observed: Student or pc wants to leave before activity
completed. Has motivators.
What to Do: Stamp on anyone who is "being reasonable" about
condition and explain to them definitions and overts. Get student
or pc handled by self or another. Refuse to let people flub this
one.
What to Direct: (a) Handle any ARC break by appropriate list.
(b) Pull any overt student or pc has recently committed in the
area. (c) Get the word, the student or pc has missed or not
understood, located and defined. (d) Get the Instructor or auditor
checked out on overts and also misdefined words.
REMEDY BJ
Applies to: CASES THAT DO NOT RESPOND TO ANY OF THE ABOVE WHEN THE
CORRECT OBSERVATION WAS MADE AND THE REMEDY WELL APPLIED.
What is Observed: No remedies work although pc has been
audited on them.
What to Do: Find out if pc
(a) Has been drawing or has been promised disability
compensation, or
(b) Is in any way being rewarded for his condition, or
(c) Has been part of any healing profession, or
(d) Is a professional auditor or Scientologist.
Assess the words "condition", "disability", "sickness" for largest
read. (Other words of like nature may be used in the assessment.)
39
What to Direct: Flatten the following process: "What (word
assessed) have you been paid for?" (Tense can also be Changed
to "are you being" or "will you be" connected to word assessed.)
40
CHAPTER 8
TECHNICAL NOTES
Note 1: THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ARC BREAK ASSESSMENTS AND BYPASSED
CHARGE AUDITING. You do not audit an ARC Break Assessment. Auditing
consists of asking or commanding and acknowledging. You don't ask
anything, or give a command and then acknowledge, while giving an
ARC Break Assessment. You just do it and indicate to the pc what
reads on the needle. You do this until the pc is cheerful again.
There are several lists. Only one (L1) applies to a session. The
others apply to levels and types of processes.
Only a skilled meter operator should do ARC Break Assessments.
An unskilled one makes only more ARC breaks by flubs.
If an auditor who can't do an ARC Break Assessment has a pc
ARC break, that auditor should find an auditor who can do an
assessment and get it done on the pc before proceeding with
auditing.
A bypassed charge assessment, unfortunately, also has
"assessment" as part of its name and can be confused with an
ARC Break Assessment. But a bypassed charge assessment is actual
auditing (Level III). Here one cleans each smallest read off
a question (but not cleaning cleans) before going on to the
next question, handling originations by the pc and acknowledging.
One never does this with an ARC broken pc. With an ARC break one
just ploughs on looking for a big read and indicates it to pc.
Note 2. THE DOUBLE ARC BREAK. If at any time during the
handling of a pc who is blowy or has blown, the pc again ARC
breaks while doing the ARC Break Assessment:. (a) locate the
charge that has just been bypassed; and then (b) resume handling
the charge that was being looked for when the new ARC break
occurred. Don't mistake mere criticism and natter which is
usually present during an ARC Break Assessment for a new
ARC break.
41
Note 3. All of the above apply to Clay Table and any other type
of auditing.
Note 4: In the Supervisor remedies I was greatly assisted by
Mary Sue who has supervised more HGC's than any other
auditor in the world.
42
CHAPTER 9
ENVOY
None of the remedies, given above, have failed when actually
applied in any case which had the symptoms for which the
process is recommended.
They have been used as the routine advice given to auditors for
their preclears by myself.
They have been used in many more instances by Mary Sue
during times she worked as a Case Supervisor or Director of
Processing in many organizations.
Almost all of these processes are quite old.
You will note that these processes do not resolve the preclear's
main aberrations. They only resolve the preclear's complaints,
lack of wins and tendencies to blow.
While useful even in general processing, few would be a
satisfactory diet for all sessions, always.
Here we are only taking up the troublesome cases, the cases
that are made troublesome by lack of wins, the case situations
which absorb the bulk of a Supervisor's time and sap his and the
auditor's morale.
I don't at the moment recall any cases or conditions of blow
different from the ones given in the tables above. And Mary Sue,
after some thought, couldn't recall any others. This does not
mean there are no others, but they would be pretty unusual if
there were.
USE BY SUPERVISORS
The apparent exception to the table, the case everybody says is
different and nut covered, falls under the "Australian heading"
(because Australians almost never do what they're asked to do.)
This exception would go somewhat like this: D of P to Staff
Auditor: "Use Remedy AG on your pc today." (Later) Staff
Auditor to D of P: "That didn't work."
This routine could be followed by the D of P thinking, "Golly,
that's a different type of case. Not covered in the table", and
sitting up half the night working out a new approach. Rather the
D of P, being wily and wise in the ways
43
of auditors, should have said to, "That didn't work." D of P to
Staff Auditor: "What didn't work?" And the staff auditor would
then have said, "Why, getting the pc to think of horrible things
to do to her husband." Which isn't, if you care to look, REMEDY
AG.
For being wily and wise myself in these matters, I always ask
"What didn't work?" And if the answer was what I'd said in the
first place, I'd have then asked the pc what was run and would
have found something else had been used.
By being sure the direction was followed and was done, I then
have found what did and didn't work; and so you have a table.
And in using it to supervise be sure that:
(1) The condition the pc is manifesting is the one reported,
(2) The right manifestation is located in the table, and
(3) The instruction is properly and completely executed.
Only if you do these things, can you supervise the auditing of
pc's successfully. The Case Supervisor or D of P who doesn't
take the three steps above, remorselessly, will have pc's blow or
will have that more gentle blow; they just don't keep on with
auditing.
But let us end on a happier note.
You have here the secrets of fourteen years of experience with
patching up cases and keeping them going.
I'm glad I thought of putting it together for you.
And you are welcome to all the success it brings.
Good auditing!
L. RON HUBBARD
44
INDEX TO REMEDIES
"Ability ruined by processing" AZ
Ack, Lack of H, AW
Advanced pc K
advice, Giving N, O, P
antagonism Auditor F
ARC breaks F, G, K, L, M, U, AH,
BH, BI
Argumentative person I
auditing, Refusing H, K
auditing, Unsuccessful K
auditing, Wasting AX
auditors, Professional BJ
auditors, Refusing L, AY
Auditors won't audit this pc AH
back track, Always BE
Between sessions N, P, Q
Bitterness I, BF
Blown M
Breaking rules AX
Bypassed charge assessment G, K, M
"Can't" type pc AF
Case, "has none" AN, AO
cases (other), Remedies for Q, BJ
comm cycles, Incompleted H, J
comm level, Audited above BB, BH
Complaining pc AR, AZ
confronting, Not AQ
control, Resisting AD
Courses A, B, C
Critical A, B, C, D, E, F, G, J,
U, Z, AT, AU
Critical of own auditor D, E, F, AU
definitions, Use of A, B, I, BG, BI
Degraded pc AF, BC, BF
"Deserves no auditing" AX
duplication, Mis- or Non- AP, BA
Destimulation K, N, O, P, Z, AG, BE
determinism, Other BC
difficulties, Can't keep ahead of N, P, BC
Disability compensation BJ
Discussion I, J
effect on auditor, Wants to produce AS
Electric shock AA
Environment N, O, P, Z
Exercises, Other fields Q
45
Flat process W, X
Friends opposed to pc N
Frowning A, B
gain, NO G, K, N, P, Q, AB, AH,
AR, BJ
gains, Sour T, AR
Goals, auditor-pc contrary AR
Goals sour beginning session M
goals, session, Didn't make T
Goal thwarted H, I, M
Havingness H, AC
Healing professions BJ
help, Wasting AX
Hidden standards G, AR
help, Difficulties with J, AF
identities, Important past BF
incident, Always runs same AI
Incomplete activity, wants to leave BI
Insane pc O
Instructors (useful to) A, B, C, G, I, J, BI
Interest, none in case AN
Inventing processes AV
Justifications AJ, AT
levels, Upper K, L
mass, Complaints about AE
misdeeds, Giving Others AT
Misdeeds, has none AK
Missed withholds C, D, L, S, U, BG
Motivators BI
Natter A, B, C, AH
New persons (non-Scientologists) A, B, H, I, J, L
notes, Writing auditor huge AW
Occlusion AL, BG
Other treatments (therapies) B, O, Q, BG, BJ
Over-flattened process T
Over-restimulation K, N, O, P, Z, BE
Overts E, F, J, L, Z, AF, AJ,
AK, AP, AT, AU, BC, BH, BI
Overts on auditor E, F, AU
overts, Giving Others AT
Overts, has none AK
overts, Obsessively giving BC
PE Course (useful to) A, B, C, I, J
PTP's G, N, P, Q, S, U, Z, AG,
AI, AR, BC, BG
46
PTP's Chronic AG, AI
PTP's, Constantly new N, P
Practices, other O, Q, BG
Practitioners L, BG, BJ
Processes (handling of)
Always must have new AP
Flat R, V, W, X, AP
Inventing AV
Over-flat T
Protesting V, X
Unflat R, V, W, X, AP, AV, AZ, BG
Wrong V
Processes (types)
Ack H, J, AW
Advice B, N, O, P
ARC Break Assessment F, G, K, L M U, AH, BH
ARC Straight Wire AA, AN
Bypassed charge assessment G, K, M
Definitions A, B, I, BG, BJ
Discussion I, J
"Done/Not done" AM
Duplication AP, BA
Effect production AS
Havingness H, AC
Help AD
Itsa G, H, M, Q, Y
Jo'burg AT
Justifications AJ, AT
Locational H, AA
Lock scanning BG
Missed withholds C, D, L, S, U, BG
Objective AL, AQ
O/W F, AM, BG
Overts E, J, L, Z, AF, AJ, AK,
AP, AU, BC, BH, BI
R4H (R2H) AH, BF
Recall AL, AN, AW, AY, BD, BG
Sec. checking AF, AK, AT
Service fac AE, BC
Solutions G, AM, BG
Universe AQ, AX
Valence AQ, AX
Validation BD
Withholds F, AK, AP, AT, AU, BB, BG
Professional auditors BJ
Psychoanalysis BG
pull overts, Unable to BH
Q&A T
queasiness, Auditing AC
questions, Non-applicable B
Recall, none AL
47
Refusing auditing H, K
Refusing auditors L, AY
Registrars (useful to) H, I, J
Relatives N, O, P
Religions, Other BG
Remedies, when none work Q, BJ
Reasonableness BI
Responsibility, none AJ
Restimulation K, N, O, P, Z, BE
Safe environment O, BB
Service fac AE, BC
shock auditor, Trying to AS
solutions, Auditor Y, Z, AA, AB
solutions, Weird Y, Z, AA, AB, AI, AM
somatics, Chronic AB
Stuck in wins W, BD
Students A, B, C
TA High S
TA action, Minimal G
TA action, none R, AB, AG, AP
Terminal scarcity AN, AW, AY
terms, Misunderstood A, B, I, BG, BI
Treatment, therapies, other B, P, Q, BC, BF
Unflat process R, V, W, X, AP, AV, AZ, BG
Unreal pc AJ, AQ
Wasting auditing, -- help AX
wins, Stuck in W, BD
Withholds F, AK, AP, AT, AU, BB, BG
"withholds", Critical AU
withholds, Never gets off BB
words, Misunderstood A, B, I, BG, BI
work in session, Won't AM
Wrong process V
L. Ron Hubbard
Founder
|
讓我們程式搜尋結果更加完美 如果您覺得該文件有幫助到您,煩請按下我如果您覺得該文件是一個一無是處的文件,也煩請按下我 |
|
該文件您看起來是亂碼嗎?您可以切換編碼方式試試看!ISO-8859-1 | latin1 | euc-kr | euc-jp | CP936 | CP950 | UTF-8 | GB2312 | BIG5 |
|